Category Archives: All

RoHS is On Deck for Medical devices and Monitoring and Control Instruments

The clock is ticking! Most medical devices (category 8) and monitoring and control instruments (category 9) will come under the EU RoHS Directive (2011/65/EU) compliance requirements in three months’ time. The specific compliance dates for category 8 and 9 products are:

  • July 22, 2014 – Medical devices and monitoring and control instruments
  •  July 22, 2016 – In-Vitro diagnostic medical devices
  • July 22, 2017 – Industrial monitoring and control instruments

RoHS compliance has been a significant challenge especially for the category 8 and 9 product manufacturers. Use of small market suppliers and materials/part selection that did not consider RoHS restrictions in the original product design add to the challenge, especially for custom parts. For example, many non-conforming metal alloys or plastic materials have been commonly used by mechanical design engineers. It’s similarly common for a supplier to procure such materials, especially in North America or Asia if they are not otherwise provided specific instructions.

The technical documentation requirement of RoHS 2 is also non-trivial. The documentation must be sufficiently complete to allow an enforcement authority to assess the conformity of the product to RoHS substance restrictions. To avoid having to redo conformity assessment work, the technical documentation should be considered simultaneously with the design/re-design of the product.

Substance Restrictions and Design Conversion

The substance restrictions, at least for the time being, include the four heavy metals Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Hexavalent Chromium and the flame retardants Polybrominated biphenyl (PBB) and Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE). These are the same substances that were restricted under the original RoHS Directive.

Although many generic electronic components migrated to RoHS compliant in 2006, category 8 and category 9 equipment manufacturers generally still need to expend significant effort in converting other parts and assemblies. Even with commodity parts, manufacturers should be aware of parts with exemptions that will be expiring in the near future. Exemptions typically expire a few years later for category 8 and 9 products; however, material and technology changes being made by suppliers may impact the parasitics of certain components which are often utilized by test and measurement products. This has been a key concern expressed by some test and measurement equipment manufacturers.

Manufacturer obligations

The RoHS 2 Directive introduced mandatory requirements for conformity assessment and other specific obligations for manufacturers, importers, and distributors. A summary of the manufacturer obligations is provided below; for the exact wording, please refer to Article 7 of the Directive:

  • draw up the required technical documentation and carry out the internal production control procedure;
  • ensure that their products have been designed and manufactured in accordance with the requirements for substance restrictions;
  • ensure that procedures are in place for series production to remain in conformity;
  • take all measures necessary so that the manufacturing process and its monitoring ensure compliance of the manufactured products with the technical documentation and with the requirements of the RoHS Directive;
  • EU declaration of conformity
  •  register of non-conforming EEE and product recalls, and keep distributors informed;
  • ensure that their EEE bears a type, batch or serial number or other element allowing its identification;
  • materials, components and EEE which have been tested or measured in accordance with harmonized standards demonstrating compliance, shall be presumed to comply with the requirements of the RoHS Directive;

RoHS Exemptions for Category 8 and 9 Products

In anticipation of category 8 and 9 products coming into scope of the RoHS2 Directive, manufacturers and industry associations have been requesting additional RoHS exemptions that are needed.

On January 9, 2014, the EU updated the RoHS 2 Annex IV list of substance exemptions with 14 new exemptions and a modification of exemption 12. The Annex IV exemptions are applicable only to Category 8 and 9 products. A complete list of the exemptions is available on our blog.

CE Marking for medical devices

The CE marking applied to products to indicate compliance with the Medical Devices Directive also meets the requirements of the RoHS Directive — only the single CE marking should be applied. However the manufacturer’s EU Declaration of Conformity needs to be updated to include attestation to the RoHS Directive.

Manufacturers of class III medical devices who submit documentation to Notified Bodies are not required to submit the RoHS technical documentation; however, they should address this in their EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) to avoid misinterpretation by customers and authorities.

Aside from the Notified Body assessment described above, some manufacturers (medical devices and other products) will contract a certification body to assess against all CE marking requirements for the product. For these assessments, the RoHS technical documentation and other RoHS requirements should be assessed; however, not all certification bodies are performing a proper RoHS review. Manufacturers should be clear with the certification body on the level of due diligence that is being performed so that they can assess their risk exposure.

April 10, 2014 – EICC/GeSI release Conflict Minerals Reporting Template Version 3.0

The EICC and GeSI industry associations have released their version 3.0 Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT).  The new template is intended to align with the new IPC-1755 conflict minerals declaration standard, but is not backward compatible with the previous version 2.03a CMRT which was used by many manufacturers for collecting their 2013 conflict minerals data.   The CMRT template is available through the EICC/GeSI conflict-free sourcing initiative .

IEC 62474 database update released – April 9, 2014

The international IEC 62474 declarable substances list (DSL) and data exchange format was updated on April 9, 2014. IEC 62474 provides the electrical and electronics industry with a material declaration standard and an internationally recognized list of substances that should be declared by suppliers to downstream manufacturers.

Additions and modifications to the Declarable Substance List (DSL)
There were several additions and modifications to the Declarable substance groups and declarable substances and to the reference substances. Details of the changes are provided in the IEC 62474 blog (see table 1).

Changes to the Data Exchange Format

A significant number of changes were made to the XML schema and accompanying developer’s table which together define the format for communicating material declaration files between upstream suppliers and downstream manufacturers. Details of the changes are available in the IEC 62474 blog.

Additional background information on IEC 62474 International Standard and the IEC 62474 online database is available from the home page from the home page of the IEC 62474 blog.

 

Conflicts Minerals Reports due May 31, 2014

The first reports for US conflict minerals reporting are due on May 31, 2014.   Although only companies that report to the SEC are officially impacted by the regulation, we’ve seen many other companies become impacted when they receive requests from customers for conflict minerals information.

The SEC’s conflict minerals rules require manufacturers to investigate and report on the origin of tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold (3TG) in their products and whether or not the minerals came from a source that potentially funded conflict in the DRC.

As a first step, manufacturers are expected to perform a reasonable country of origin enquiry. Given that the mineral ores are acquired many levels up the supply chain, this is continuing to prove to be quite the challenge for most companies.

Many companies are expected to use the “indeterminate origin” category for the first couple years. However, the “reasonable country of origin enquiry” must be performed and all other requirements of the rules must be met (including SEC filing).

EICC/GeSI Version 3 template for 2014

EICC/GeSI are about to publish version 3 of their Conflict Minerals Reporting Template. Unfortunately, the template is not backwards compatible with the current version 2.03 template; therefore, EICC/GeSI is suggesting manufactures adopt the version 3 template for the 2014 calendar year purchasing of products, parts, and material that contain any of the 3TG metals.

The Power of IEC 62474 for Product Compliance and Eco-design

An article about the application and flexibility of material declarations (IEC 62474 in particular) was published in the April 2014 issue of In Compliance magazine. The article titled “The Power of IEC 62474 for Product Compliance and Eco-design” discusses the industry need to identify regulated substances in EEE products and the value of material declarations to assess and document product compliance. EN 50581 – the RoHS 2 harmonized standard for technical documentation – specifically references IEC 62474 because the material declaration standard was written to provide manufacturers with sufficient information to calculate product conformity to substance regulations.

A synopsis of the article and hyperlink to its location in the in compliance website are provided in the post on the IEC62474 blog.

March 26, 2014 – EU identifies 120 substances for evaluation as possible SVHCs

The emergence of regulated substances is not likely to slow down anytime soon.  The European Union, on March 26, 2014, identified its list of 120 substances that EU Member States will evaluate over the next three years from 2014 to 2016. The substances are included in the EU’s Community rolling action  plan. Of these 120 substance, 53 of the substances were newly added this year — 67 of the substances were already in the plan.

The substance evaluations are spread across the 3 years: 51 substances in 2014; 48 substances in 2015; and 21 substances in 2016.

To avoid duplication of work, each substance is assigned to a specific EU member state who is responsible for performing the evaluation is accordance to the requirements specified in REACH Chapter 2 (Substance Evaluation).

The results of each evaluation will then be reviewed to assess whether the substance should be considered for the SVHC Candidate List (REACH Article 48) and/or for possible restriction in REACH Annex XVII (Article 69).  When a substance is added to the SVHC Candidate list, disclosure obligations are immediately triggered for manufacturers and importers of products that contain the substance above the threshold.  Once on the SVHC Candidate List, the substance also becomes eligible for the REACH Annex XIV Authorisation List (Article 57).

How the Plan helps industry!

This substance evaluation plan provides industry with some indication of the number and identity of substances that will be proposed for the SVHC Candidate List and Annex XVII restrictions over the next few years.  It’s always possible (even likely ) that new information will cause a few other substances to suddenly jump the priority list, but these will be rare exceptions.

Assessing which of these substances are relevant to  our industry

The plan includes  quite a few substances that  the electronics industry or supply chain may be using. Manufacturers can use this information as advance notice of potential issues with the long-term  use of these substances and the need to start to investigate alternatives.   In particular, 4 phthalates are currently identified on the 2014-2016 plan. Phthalates are commonly used  as plasticizers in PVC and other plastics.

Many of the other substances on the list are intermediate manufacturing chemicals, which ideally would not remain in a finished product; however, in many manufacturing processes, there a possibly that some unreacted quantity of the substance remains in the product.  The possibility of an unreacted substance remaining above the 0.1% w/w threshold depends on many factors including the manufacturing process, ratio of chemicals used, quality controls in manufacturing, etc.

Once the substances have been evaluated, some of the substances will be proposed for the  SVHC Candidate List and undergo an initial public consultation.  Once this happens, an industry-led International group of experts will screen the substance for potential relevanance to the electrical and electronics industry.  This group of International experts make up the validation team for the International materials declaration standard IEC 62474. IEC 62474 is an International Standard on material declaration. It includes an internationally recognized Declarable Substance List (DSL), a material declaration procedure and an XML-schema for data exchange.  The validation Team is responsible for regularly  updating the DSL  (usually twice a year).

Additional information on IEC 62474 and the validation team is available on the IEC 62474 blog at http://iec62474.rohs.ca.

For assistance in developing a roadmap of substances to conerns for your engineering teams and suppliers, contact ECD Compliance.

Standards – Sustainability for and by Information Technology (JTC1/SC39)

The joint ISO and IEC standards committee JTC1/SC39 titled “Sustainability for and by Information Technology” was created in 2012 and has the scope

Standardization related to the intersection of resource efficiency and IT which supports environmentally and economically viable development, application, operation and management aspects.

Current standards that are in development are focused on environmental performance of data centers and other Information Technology Equipment.

The work programme includes:

  • ISO/IEC NP 30131: Information technology — Data Centres — Taxonomy and Maturity ISO/IEC NP 30132: Information technology — IT Sustainability — Guidance for the Development of Energy Efficient ICT Products
  • ISO/IEC NP 30134-1: Information Technology — Data Centres — Key performance indicators — Part 1: Overview and general requirements
  • ISO/IEC NP 30134-2: Information Technology — Data Centres — Key performance indicators — Part 2: Power usage effectiveness (PUE)

IEC/TC111 – Environmental standardization for electrical and electronic products and systems

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) created technical committee TC111 in 2004 to develop internationally recognized standards to assist manufacturers in complying with emerging environmental legislation of Electronic Equipment. The use of harmonized standards reduces uncertainty and risk for international trade and helps enables communication and consistency across a global supply chain.

The TC111 work program includes development of international standards or specifications under the following work program:

Published Standards

  • IEC/TR 62476: Guidance for evaluation of product with respect to substance-use restrictions in electrical and electronic products
  • IEC 62430: Environmentally Conscious Design
  • IEC 62321: Test Methods of Six Hazardous Substances
  • IEC PAS 62596: Determination of restricted substances – Sampling procedure – Guidelines (Withdrawn — content has been integrated into IEC 62321-2
  • IEC 62321-X: Revised Test Methods partitioned into separate standards
  • IEC 62474: Materials Declaration
  • IEC/TR 62635: Guidelines for end-of-life information provided by manufacturers and recyclers and for recyclability rate calculation of electrical and electronic equipment
  • IEC/TR 62725: Analysis of quantification methodologies of greenhouse gas emissions for electrical and electronic products and systems
  • IEC 62542: Environmental standardization for electrical and electronic products and systems – Glossary of terms

Standards in Development

  • IEC/TR 62726: Quantification Methodology of greenhouse gas emission (CO2e) reductions for electrical and electronic products and systems from the project baseline
  • IEC/TR 62824: Guidance on consideration and evaluation on material efficiency of electrical and electronic products in environmentally conscious design
  • IEC 62321-6: Determination of certain substances in electrotechnical products – Part 6: Determination of polybrominated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in polymers and electronics by GC-MS, IAMS and HPLC-UV
  • IEC 62321-7-1: Determination of certain substances in electrotechnical products – Part 7-1: Determination of the presence of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) in colourless and coloured corrosion-protected coatings on metals by the colorimetric method
  • IEC 62321-7-2: Determination of certain substances in electrotechnical products – Part 7-2: Determination of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) in polymers and electronics by the colorimetric method.
  • IEC 62321-8: IEC 62321-8 Ed.1 – Determination of certain substances in electrotechnical products – Part 8: Determination of specific phthalates in polymer materials by mass spectrometry
  • IEC/TR 62474-1: Guidance to Implement IEC 62474

A Maturity Model for Sustainability in New Product Development

“A Maturity Model for Sustainability in New Product Development” was published in the January-February issues of the Research-Technology Management (RTM) journal.  The article is the culmination of work from an Industrial Research Institute (IRI) research-on-research (ROR) project to develop a maturity model and assessment tool that enables organizations to assess their sustainability practices during new product development (NPD). The assessment tool can help organizations leverage sustainability in their new product development and gain competitive advantage. ECD Compliance (with support provided by Intertek) had the opportunity to contribute to the development of the maturity model in 2012 and 2013.

The maturity model considers sustainability performance attributes in 14 dimensions which have been organized into two groups: Strategy Dimensions and Design Tools Dimensions. For each of the dimensions attributes were identified at four different maturity levels: Beginning, Improving, Succeeding, and Leading.

Strategy Dimensions

  • Corporate Sustainability Policy
  • Overall Sustainability Strategy
  • Government Policy & Regulation
  • Impact of Trends
  • Supply Chain (CSR)
  • Green labeling
  • Sustainability Design for Environment (DfE)

Design Tools Dimensions

  • Specifications/Customer Insights
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Process
  • DfE–Material and Part Selection
  • DfE–Supply Chain
  • DfE–Manufacturing Impact
  • DfE–Use Phase Impact
  • DfE–End of Life Impact

The article authors are: Jeff Hynds, Virginia Brandt, Susan Burek, Walter Jager, Peter Knox, Jamie Pero Parker, Lawrence Schwartz, John Taylor, and Miriam Zietlow.

For additional information, the RTM journal is available from the IRI website or contact us on implementing sustainability practices.

March 13, 2014 – Priority Products Identified for California Safer Consumer Products Regulation

The California Department of Toxic Substances control has announced their initial list of three priority products. As we had expected, there is minimal direct impact on the electrical and electronics industry. The first three priority products are:

    1. Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Systems containing unreacted diisocyanates
    2. Children’s Foam Padded Sleeping Products containing Tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate or TDCPP
    3. Paint and Varnish Strippers, and Surface Cleaners with methylene chloride