{"id":1086,"date":"2016-02-09T13:59:04","date_gmt":"2016-02-09T18:59:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/?p=1086"},"modified":"2016-03-23T14:16:51","modified_gmt":"2016-03-23T18:16:51","slug":"california-approves-new-prop-65-website","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/2016\/02\/09\/california-approves-new-prop-65-website\/","title":{"rendered":"California \u2013 Approves New Prop 65 Website"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>California&#8217;s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has approved the adoption of the &#8220;Lead Agency Website&#8221; regulation (Section 25205). The regulation requires OEHHA to create a website providing information to the public on exposure to chemicals that require warning disclosure under Proposition 65. The regulation has been very controversial with industry, including several trade groups.<\/p>\n<p>Under the Regulation, which takes effect on 1 April, 2016, a manufacturer, producer, distributor or importer of a product giving a Prop 65 warning will have to provide, within 90 days of the agency&#8217;s request:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the name of the listed chemical(s) for which warning is given;<\/li>\n<li>the location of the chemical(s) in products that require warning under Prop 65;<\/li>\n<li>the concentration of the chemical(s) in these final products;<\/li>\n<li>anticipated routes or pathways of exposure to listed chemicals; and<\/li>\n<li>estimated levels of exposure to the chemical(s).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The regulation and additional information is available on the <a href=\"http:\/\/oehha.ca.gov\/prop65\/CRNR_notices\/WarningWeb\/012516leadagencywebsite.html\" target=\"_blank\">OEHHA website<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>California&#8217;s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has approved the adoption of the &#8220;Lead Agency Website&#8221; regulation (Section 25205). The regulation requires OEHHA to create a website providing information to the public on exposure to chemicals that require warning disclosure under Proposition 65. The regulation has been very controversial with industry, including several trade [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,100],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all","category-nl2016q1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1086","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1086"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1086\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1128,"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1086\/revisions\/1128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rohs.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}